land of the free

Two Fridays ago I found myself at an intimate gathering in DUMBO, Brooklyn’s art district, to look at some photos. The photographers were from the big media outlets—the Associated Press, TIME Magazine, The New York Times, and others. These journalists were at various times embedded with troops in Iraq following the post-9/11 invasion.

Iraqi Child | image: PimpinTurtle.com

The experience exhausted me, seeing those photos. How the people live—the ones our government thinks of as monsters. It was heartbreaking to see decapitated soldiers and dead children in the streets. But the Iraq War is an abstract thought here at home; it’s easy to dismiss our nation’s drift into a fascist ‘neutral zone.’ One by one, our constitutional freedoms are being taken away. Do we feel the temperature rising?

In a recent Huffington Post article, Stephen Funk details a trip to the Presidio’s San Francisco National Cemetery. He writes how 30,000 tiny recycled American flags mark the graves of ex-patriots, and how he doubts he’ll ever be buried alongside military personnel there—or anywhere—because of the fact that he’s spoken out against the war and because he went to prison for speaking out. And because he’s gay. Soldiers have no first amendment rights.

I read Nat Hentoff’s Village Voice article that tells the story of a young German, Murat Kurnaz ,who at age 19, upon traveling to Pakistan to learn more about his faith months after the 9/11 attacks, was kidnapped by the U.S. government and imprisoned for 5 years—tortured even when overwhelming evidence pointed to his innocence. I’m not surprised to learn of this, after reading Naomi Wolf’s controversial book The End of America:

One of the first things the Nazis did was to establish prisons in legal “outer space,” often in basements, guarded by SS officers who were not accountable to the state….Hitler came to power in a democracy that at first still possessed an independent judiciary, human rights lawyers, an accountable military, and a legitimate prison system. But, in a matter of months, he had deployed a paramilitary force answerable to him; set in motion an alternative system of tribunals in which his representatives served as judge, jury, and executioner; and established a network of illegitimate prisons where torture took place.

Murat Kurnaz | image: Brigitte.de

In addition to other crimes, the Bush Administration has circumvented the United States Constitution to expand governmental jurisdiction for the War on Terror. A system of secret prisons was created to facilitate rendition and justify the use of torture. Using these prisons off of American soil represents a legal loophole; torturing and detaining ordinary citizens without provocation on American soil is against the Constitution. According to Wolf’s research, “Guantanamo… was, in fact, outlawed by the Geneva Conventions of 1949.” (Wolf, 51). Kurnaz was tortured by the U.S. government in a place ‘condemned’ by the Geneva Conventions, for five years, even though he was innocent. And he isn’t alone. In 2006, Jose Padilla was found guilty by the U.S. Supreme Court for conspiring to set off a dirty bomb (more on Padilla here). And at home, the U.S. government has built up the largest and most powerful privately owned paramilitary force. Blackwater and other private military contractors aren’t bound to the Constitution as the military is.

Banksy street artwork | image: Revista Amauta

Dana Priest and Amy Goldstein at The Washington Post wrote a breathtaking article about U.S. immigrant concentration camps. Yusif Osman, a native of Ghana, died in one of these prisons because of “shabby medical care.” His health wasn’t taken seriously. And his case isn’t unique:

Osman’s death is a single tragedy in a larger story of life, death and often shabby medical care within an unseen network of special prisons for foreign detainees across the country. Some 33,000 people are crammed into these overcrowded compounds on a given day, waiting to be deported or for a judge to let them stay here.

This invisible network of prisons is, at worst, akin to the Nazi concentration camp. Aushwitz prisoners weren’t cared for, and like the Nazi camps, these immigrant concentration camps also imprison the innocent:

Most are working-class men and women or indigent laborers who made mistakes that seem to pose no threat to national security: a Salvadoran who bought drugs in his 20th year of poverty in Los Angeles; a U.S. legal U.S. resident from Mexico who took $50 for driving two undocumented day laborers into a border city. Or they are waiting for political asylum from danger in their own countries: a Somali without a valid visa trying to prove she would be killed had she remained in her village; a journalist who fled Congo out of fear fro his life, worked as a limousine driver and fathered six American children, but never was able to get the asylum he sought.

If the image of Nazi persecution doesn’t make you think about how American freedoms might eventually fade, imagine neighbors turning neighbors in over such issues as undocumented immigration. With the passage of his 2007 immigration reform bill, Oklahoma Governor Brad Henry took power from the federal government and created a hostile environment for that state’s estimated 100,000 illegal immigrants by endorsing discrimination in housing and education.

Iraq Oil Fields | image: Shawn Baldwin

What baffled me in DUMBO that night was the ignorance displayed over our invasion of Iraq. I was expecting to engage an educated lot, but when the lights came back up I had instead taken a time machine to past theories about why the United States would invade a sovereign nation that had made no declaration of war—at the risk of insulting your intelligence, I’ll remind you that there were no weapons of mass destruction uncovered in Iraq. Shortly after discussion began around the invasion and occupation, I raised my hand, and when I suggested that the United States could have invaded Iraq for oil and to destabilize the region, I was greeted by vacant stares. These people acted as if they had no idea what I was talking about; I was even scoffed at by a man to my right when I suggested we look to the future to solve our problems—did he think I was some sort of pollyanna?

Advertisement

8 Responses

  1. Doesn’t pride in an idealistic theory become insignificant after a long history of wrongdoing? Democracy is a vacant word; people fill its definition with whatever they choose.

    Check out the Flobots and their lyrics, I think you’d like them.

  2. You know, I would almost agree with you. Looking back at our history (particularly what our history books tell us about our forefathers — and what they don’t tell us) I found it hard to put into words what I am proud of. Mainly, it is the ideal. Sure, there is a whole lot about our country I would trade in a minute – racism and homophobia to name a few. But looking at all of the good our country has given us — free speech, freedom of assembly, freedom to pursue your dreams, to start something from nothing and watch it fly — those are the things we should fight for.

    Thanks for the Flobots tip. I checked them out and I do like the lyrics. a lot.

    C

  3. You probably realize this revolution/uprising of the people is termed Anarchy…It’s entirely about community and doing what’s right for the people as opposed to just a small faction, ie taking back power and command over resources – true freedom. If anarchy redefines America then so be it. The term never matters as much as the action.

    I’m not a spokesperson for them, but I know the Flobots have the same anarchic ideals behind pushing social activism. glad you like them.

  4. Great point.

    Although we may at some point in the future need an “all-encompassing” event to swing the pendulum back to true democracy, I’m not sure it’s the type of environment we’d want to pervade for very long. I stand by democracy.

    The problem, I feel, is that we are too young a species to responsibly embrace capitalism (which I also stand by). As we’ve heard before, “money is the root of all evil.” And it’s true. Look at all of the mishaps of society here and everywhere and it always seems to come back to the maldistribution of wealth and power.

    With rising population and dwindling resources we’re likely to see this problem magnify ten-fold. We’ve seen the tip of the iceberg with Desert Storm and the Iraq War.

    While I’m not necessarily one for Anarchy (as traditionally taught), I would be open to learning more about how we can embrace its ideals to truly bring power back to the people. I think we can all agree that the lines between “big corporation” and “government” have blurred considerably. We must also be sure to keep our “checks and balances” in play: Executive, Judicial and Legislative branches of government must always be allowed to work independently of one another.

    That’s a process, I feel, the current administration has worked long and hard to undermine.

  5. This just in from GuardianUK:

    “The future of the infamous Guantánamo detention centre was thrown into doubt yesterday after the US supreme court delivered the most serious blow yet to President George Bush’s policy of holding prisoners indefinitely without trial.”

    Seems like the checks and balances are working.

    Read the full article

  6. Thanks for the link you sent me via Shelfari. I enjoyed reading your post and I couldn’t agree with you more. I become shaky and nauseated when I think too long and hard about these topics and what it means for my future and my (someday) children’s future. I guess, now, what I need to do is get off my arse and do something about it. I’m tired of all the cynicism. I’m tired of the critics that have come to apathy, myself included. The dialogue is helpful, no doubt, but we need more than that.

    Last night when Keith Olberman replayed his interview with George Carlin, I was struck by something Carlin said. He said that Americans have essentially been placated with our toys and other comforts. We somehow disassociate ourselves from the real infringements on our civil liberties because we have iPhones and Starbucks and it *seems* that we are unaffected. But if we don’t do something, we will be directly affected. Why aren’t some European or UK governments inciting fascist tactics on their citizens? Because their citizen wouldn’t stand for it. They’d be out in the streets, protesting in an uproar.

    I think Americans need to pay attention. This all happened right under our noses, after all.

  7. I agree, Claire. But the burning question: how to mobilize. I’ve been doing research (a bit of reading “between stops” so to speak) on what revolutionaries have done before us, to mobilize, incite, inspire. Have to start somewhere.

    But just as all social issues are deeply seeded (Homophobia comes to mind, in that it originates with sexism – as does racism), the political issues of the day seem to begin (and may end) with money (or the lack of it). Money, it’s all about money, money, money, and the illusion of wealth post-modernism has bestowed upon us.

  8. [...] don’t fall on “the side of the few.” How long will it take for us to realize that our freedoms are gone, that we have become slaves, that life has been [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.